Question:  A friend of mine was having a Halloween party and I was sending her a package of decorations.  I was sending it UPS and gave it plenty of time (2 weeks) to get there (Texas to Ontario, Canada) When UPS picked it up the driver neglected to grab the invoice which is required on all international shipping.  I was not aware of this until four days later (7 days before Halloween) when he left a note on my door saying I could call this number (which no one ever answered) or fax it to the local office - which he didn't leave.  Since UPS closes on weekends I was forced to wait until Monday (Halloween's on Friday), I gave them the situation and asked if they could overnight it - they said no problem however they could not find my package! Someone had hand-written an invoice and sent it on its way.  I spent the next three days trying to track down my package and overnight it from there - but I was unsuccessful in my attempt... The package finally arrived at its location 5 days past Halloween when it got someone's attention.  I would appreciate any help or feedback you can offer.

 

Signed "Glenn," Texas, January 1999**

 

Answer:   UPS would probably have a standard bill of lading contract which governs the situation.  It would certainly contain a standard limitation of liability clause which says that you cannot claim more than a given sum, for example $100, for loss of goods, unless a greater value is declared when shipping.

 

Your problem does not concern a loss of goods, but a late delivery.  For late delivery, carriers only promise to refund the cost of the service.

 

Clauses that limit the amount of a carrier's liability are reasonable because the carrier cannot be expected to assume responsibility for potential losses that may be out of proportion to the revenue derived from providing the service.

 

Limitation clauses are scrutinized carefully, but especially those that might limit liability for the carrier's own negligence.  That may or may not be the case here.  Limiting damages for late delivery of goods to the value price of the service is essentially an effort to limit damages for the carrier's own negligence.  Therefore, you will want to argue that the clause cannot be given any force or effect because it invalidates the very promise and premise of courier services, that is, to deliver parcels in a timely and certain manner.

 

You should therefore be demanding some restitution from UPS, but don't expect any kind of fortune, perhaps $50 or $100.

 

Questions and Answers at Golishlaw.com